Review what users experience, not what engineers wrote.

Diffs show what changed in code, not what changed for users. Every pull request should come with clickable scenes of the moments that matter.

github.com/northwind/logistics/pull/482
Mmidstreambotcommented 4 minutes ago

Three scenes changed on this branch. Each link opens a running instance of your app at that moment.

quote-flow / rates-loadedOpen ↗
checkout / coupon-appliedOpen ↗
billing / seat-addedOpen ↗

Pull requests get approved on looks-right, not works-right

The gap between reading code and experiencing the result is where bugs and UX regressions slip through. Most changes get rubber-stamped because actually testing one is too much friction — clone the branch, run the app, navigate to the right state, log in as the right user. So people don’t.

Scene links in every pull request

Every pull request gets a comment with a link to each scene. Reviewers click, land in the app at the exact right moment, and interact with the real thing. No setup, no context switching.

  • Scene links inline with the diff — no context switch.
  • Each reviewer gets their own instance to explore safely.

Seeded state, not a staging environment

Viewers don’t start from a login screen. They land signed in, with the right data, at the right step. The friction that stopped you from actually checking is gone.

Know exactly what changed

Midstream marks which scenes the branch moved. If a test file changed, if the capture differs, if a scene was added or removed — reviewers know exactly where to look.

Reviews that catch it before the merge

Fewer “wait, that’s not what I expected” moments in sprint review. Feedback loops measured in minutes, not days.

The best pull request description is a link that drops the reviewer straight into the change.

Stop guessing. Start reviewing.

Start for free ↗

One line of code. No card.